Leadership

OKRA Session #2: Harvesting Milestones—From OKR Hypotheses to Action

Turn OKR hypotheses into actionable milestones, epics, and experiments—with facilitation techniques that prioritize learning over delivery theater

1. From Hypotheses to Actionable Milestones

After Session #1, the team walks away with draft Objectives, Key Results, and a set of hypotheses. Session #2 takes that intent and makes it operational. It’s the moment where bets become plans—where ideas gain weight through real milestones, epics, spikes, and experiments.

This session is not about locking timelines. It’s about identifying the essential work that will validate our assumptions and move us closer to our goals. It’s where empowered teams, connected to the leadership vision, use their product, customer, and tech insight to answer: “What do we need to ship, test, or build confidence in?”

When to ExecuteWhy It Matters
After Session #1Turns OKR hypotheses into structured work
Before planningEnables accurate estimation & sequencing

This is how product teams avoid roadmap theatre—by grounding every commitment in learning, not wishful thinking.

2. Workshop Flow: From Objectives to Milestone Candidates

The structure we follow is collaborative and layered:

  1. Start With Context — A stakeholder or facilitator presents each Objective and its linked hypotheses.
  2. Team Mapping — In pairs, identify features, tools, or initiatives your team owns that connect to the OKRs.
  3. Silent Ideation — Each person writes down possible milestones that would prove or validate a hypothesis.
  4. Read & Cluster — Share ideas, group duplicates, and refine overlaps.
  5. Milestone Validation — For each grouped milestone, identify its link to the hypothesis, what type of work it is (epic, spike, etc.), and whether it unlocks or validates anything.
# Folder example
okra/
├── session-2/
│   ├── objectives.md
│   ├── hypotheses.md
│   ├── milestone-candidates.csv
│   └── clusters-and-types.md

Use cards, colors, or spreadsheets. The format matters less than the conversation.

3. Common Types of Milestones

Not every milestone is a feature. Many of the best ones are validation mechanisms. Here’s how we categorize them:

Milestone TypePurposeExamples
EpicA major initiative, often multi-sprintBuild friend-invite reward system
SpikeSmall, time-boxed research or validationExplore new ranking algorithm
EnablerPlatform or infra preconditionSet up match history API cache
Signal TestExperiment to validate behaviorRun A/B test on search filters UX

A good milestone reduces uncertainty. A great one drives decision-making.

Milestone: Email-based match feedback form
Type: Epic
Hypothesis: If we make feedback easier, more players will submit ratings
Link: KR3 of Objective "Build trust through match experiences"

4. Facilitation: Make It Collaborative, Not Performative

Here’s how we structure the session to remain fast and participatory:

  1. Present team’s Objectives and hypotheses
  2. Ask each pair to map their team scope against OKRs
  3. Silent milestone writing (1 idea per card)
  4. Group cards by theme/hypothesis
  5. Walk through each cluster: add missing ideas, remove noise, assign types
  6. End with prioritization: each person votes on most critical milestones

Use techniques like:

  • Divide and Conquer (for mapping owned features)
  • Tell and Cluster (for grouping ideas)
  • Voting (to focus execution capacity)

Keep energy high. This is not backlog grooming—it’s directional alignment.

5. What You’ll Have at the End

This session will not give you a Gantt chart. It gives you a strategic inventory of work. That includes:

  • A validated list of Objectives, refined from Session #1
  • Clusters of milestones mapped to hypotheses and outcomes
  • A prioritized view of where the team should focus to learn the most
Objective: Drive growth through social sharing
Milestone: Enable sharing from match details with referral tracking
Type: Epic
Hypothesis: If users can share with attribution, they'll invite more friends

You’ll now be ready to enter planning with a sharper sense of scope, evidence, and purpose.